Letter from James Adams, Glasgow, to John Hutton Balfour dated 1854; Adams is impressed by Dr. Abernethy's paper, Balfour's remarks and also those of Balfour's friends who agree with you on the Coal question; Greville's acceptance of the Civil jury's decision has not affected the scientific question. Such a style of controversy shows how Scientific opinions can differ widely, free from personal views. Adams requests a delay in decisions until Balfour has a fuller explanation of the rings in the section of coal shown. [continues at length disagreeing with Balfour's evidence] and states that although Balfour's explanation was innocent it was mistaken and he should recall it in the name of Science. Adams writes this as a friendly challenge and the result will either modify Balfour's views or those of Adams and others who disagree.
Showing 3310 results
Archival description
81 results with digital objects
Show results with digital objects
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B141
·
Item
·
1850
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B146
·
Item
·
1852
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B138
·
Item
·
1850
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/G/G87
·
Item
·
15/01/1879
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/A/A3
·
Item
·
1854
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B259
·
Item
·
1856
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/C/C25/2
·
Item
·
17/01/1866
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B476
·
Item
·
1867
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B291
·
Item
·
undated
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives
GB 235 RBG/1/JHB/1/1/B/B292
·
Item
·
undated
Part of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Institutional Archives